Topological Musings
Ok, this one looks like it’s from XKCD but I am not entirely sure. If you do happen to know the source, I will greatly appreciate if you would tell me about it, so that I can properly cite it.
[ Thanks to Dr Armstrong for providing the correct link. ]
| Strong equidistribut… on Platonic Solids and Euler… | |
 | m.s.mohamed ansari on The 54th Carnival of Math… |
| Convictions ·… on Continued fraction for e | |
 | Wayne J. Mann on Solution to POW-12: A graph co… |
 | erneststephen on The 54th Carnival of Math… |
 | anhtraisg on p^q + q^p is prime |
 | prof dr drd horia or… on My first post |
 | prof drd horia orasa… on My first post |
 | prof dr mircea orasa… on Inequality with log |
 | notedscholar on Self-referential Paradoxes, In… |
 | prof dr mircea orasa… on Inequality with log |
 | prof dr mircea orasa… on Inequality with log |
 | prof dr mircea orasa… on 2010 in review |
 | kenji on Basic category theory, I |
 | prof dr mircea orasa… on Solution to POW-10: Another ha… |
Todd and Vishal's blog 
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 22, 2008 at 7:34 pm
John Armstrong
http://xkcd.com/179/
Your Google-fu is weak, young padawan 😀
February 22, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Vishal
Indeed, it is quite weak right now, Master! 😀
Though, I think “Google-fu” should be replaced with “Goog-Fu”. That way it rhymes with Kung-Fu!