<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Platonic Solids and Euler&#8217;s Formula for Polyhedra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/platonic-solids-and-eulers-formula-for-polyhedra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/platonic-solids-and-eulers-formula-for-polyhedra/</link>
	<description>Topological Musings</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/platonic-solids-and-eulers-formula-for-polyhedra/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Well, indeed, I read the first few pages of &lt;i&gt;Proof and Refutations&lt;/i&gt; before sorta "losing" interest in it. Maybe I should get a copy from the library again! Thanks very much for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, indeed, I read the first few pages of <i>Proof and Refutations</i> before sorta &#8220;losing&#8221; interest in it. Maybe I should get a copy from the library again! Thanks very much for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/platonic-solids-and-eulers-formula-for-polyhedra/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topologicalmusings.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-58</guid>
		<description>You might want to be very careful around the Euler characteristic.  Have you read Lakatos' &lt;i&gt;Proofs and Refutations&lt;/i&gt;?  It pretty neatly dissects some of these terms, and some of those "proofs" to figure out what's really being proved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to be very careful around the Euler characteristic.  Have you read Lakatos&#8217; <i>Proofs and Refutations</i>?  It pretty neatly dissects some of these terms, and some of those &#8220;proofs&#8221; to figure out what&#8217;s really being proved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
